Ruth 1:2
KJV
And
the name of the man was Elimelech, and the name of his wife
Naomi, and the name of his two sons Mahlon and Chilion, Ephrathites of
Bethlehemjudah. And they came into the country of Moab, and continued there.
(Bible.cc)
Hebrew Bible
2 וְשֵׁם
(The name) הָאִישׁ (of the man) אֱלִימֶלֶךְ
(Elimelech) וְשֵׁם (and
the name) אִשְׁתֹּו (of
his wife) נָעֳמִי (Naomi) וְשֵׁם (and
the name) שְׁנֵי־בָנָיו (of
his two sons) ׀
מַחְלֹון (Mahlon) וְכִלְיֹון (and Chillion) אֶפְרָתִים (Ephrathites) מִבֵּית (from
Beth-) לֶחֶם (lehem) יְהוּדָה (Judah) וַיָּבֹאוּ (entered) שְׂדֵי־מֹואָב (the
land of Moab) וַיִּהְיוּ־שָׁם (and remained there)׃
(biblos.com)
Septuagint (Greek)
2καὶ ὄνομα τῷ ἀνδρὶ
αβιμελεχ καὶ ὄνομα τῇ γυναικὶ αὐτοῦ νωεμιν καὶ ὄνομα τοῖς δυσὶν υἱοῖς αὐτοῦ
μααλων καὶ χελαιων εφραθαῖοι ἐκ βαιθλεεμ τῆς ιουδα καὶ ἤλθοσαν εἰς ἀγρὸν μωαβ
καὶ ἦσαν ἐκεῖ
(biblos.com)
And the name of the man was Elimelech
Gill writes in His commentary of the Bible: “And the name of the man was Elimelech, [Eli = God, Melech = King] .... Which signifies
"my God is King", as he was King over Israel. In the times of the
judges, the government was a theocracy; the judges were raised up immediately
by the Lord, and ruled under him;”
Notice that the word “was” in our Bibles is usually written
in italics which indicates that it is not found in the original language of
Scripture. This is because that unlike English and Greek, the Hebrew language
does not have and word for the verb “to be” of and derived words, including the
word “was” which is the past tense of “to be”.
Also of note, is that the word “was” is not found in the
Septuagint which takes on the exact sentence form as the original Hebrew.
And the name of his wife Naomi
According
to Clarke, the name Naomi means “Beautiful” or “Pleasant”. We will find later
in the chapter that Naomi changes her name to “Mara” which means bitter, which
is in direct contrast to her name on Naomi.
And the name of his two sons Mahlon and Chilion
Mahlon - Infirmity.
Chilion - Finished,
completed.
(Clarkes
commentary)
And
according to the Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary: “Mahlon
and Chilion, are supposed to be the same as Joash and Saraph (1Ch 4:22)”. Although this is only based on the association with the
land of Moab.
Ephrathites of Bethlehemjudah
Ephrath
is just another name for Bethlehem. Also known as Bethlehem Ephrathah.
This
is the Bethlehem where our Lord Jesus Christ was born. (see commentary on Ruth
1:1)
And they came into the country of Moab, and continued there.
The
Moabites were related to the Israelites, as they were descendants of Lot. (see
commentary on Ruth 1:1)
No comments:
Post a Comment